Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function
 implementations
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
        Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>, Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
        Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
References: <1935365a-bd7c-461e-6a84-0c5d3a501fff@users.sourceforge.net>
 <1492720654.3041.16.camel@redhat.com>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <8f433ee0-4dde-44db-cd36-fc2831b45df6@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:02:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1492720654.3041.16.camel@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 373
Lines: 13

> I've dropped this entire series.  If you want me to consider it, you
> need to respin it with the following changes:

How do you think about to integrate any of my update suggestions
which you do not find controversial (or questionable) at the moment?


> 1) Put all similar corrections in a single patch.

I preferred an other patch granularity so far.

Regards,
Markus