Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1033995AbdDTXaa (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 19:30:30 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:33963 "EHLO mail-io0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031440AbdDTXa2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 19:30:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] nvme APST quirk updates, take two To: Andy Lutomirski References: Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kai-Heng Feng , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Keith Busch From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 17:30:23 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 560 Lines: 17 On 04/20/2017 02:37 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Hi Jens- > > These are just the quirk updates, split out. The patches are > unchanged. > > I think that, even if we want to apply a broader quirk for 4.11, we > should still apply these so that we can cleanly revert the broader > quirk later. IOW, let's get the known regressions fixed before we > get too excited about the unknown regressions. Applied - and I agree, we should still do this and if we do a default-off type of patch, then we can easily revert that one on its own for 4.12. -- Jens Axboe