Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1034727AbdDUCXg (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:23:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57970 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1034562AbdDUCXd (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:23:33 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 07CC919CBD8 Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dledford@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 07CC919CBD8 Message-ID: <1492741411.3041.23.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations From: Doug Ledford To: SF Markus Elfring , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Hal Rosenstock , Leon Romanovsky , Matan Barak , Sean Hefty , Yishai Hadas Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:23:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8f433ee0-4dde-44db-cd36-fc2831b45df6@users.sourceforge.net> References: <1935365a-bd7c-461e-6a84-0c5d3a501fff@users.sourceforge.net> <1492720654.3041.16.camel@redhat.com> <8f433ee0-4dde-44db-cd36-fc2831b45df6@users.sourceforge.net> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 02:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 961 Lines: 28 On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 23:02 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > > > I've dropped this entire series.  If you want me to consider it, > > you > > need to respin it with the following changes: > > How do you think about to integrate any of my update suggestions > which you do not find controversial (or questionable) at the moment? No.  Far too many of your patches need commit messages fixes and the like.  If you want me to include them, then follow all of the requirements I gave you. > > > > > 1) Put all similar corrections in a single patch. > > I preferred an other patch granularity so far. Not to be too blunt about it, but your preference is not the one that matters in this situation.  If you want me to consider the patches, then you need to respin them following the directions I gave. -- Doug Ledford     GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD     Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD