Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263205AbTFDLNf (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2003 07:13:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263212AbTFDLNf (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2003 07:13:35 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:19331 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263205AbTFDLNe (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2003 07:13:34 -0400 Subject: Re: siimage slow on 2.4.21-rc6-ac2 From: Alan Cox To: Andre Hedrick Cc: Mauk van der Laan , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1054722547.9233.93.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 04 Jun 2003 11:29:08 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 933 Lines: 24 On Mer, 2003-06-04 at 01:53, Andre Hedrick wrote: > NO, it is not irrelevant. > > Seagate and Silicon Image are the only two player (well intel now) who did > their own PHY. They did not use the Marvel pairs. Ok I know about the maxtor+marvel phy problem I didnt know about SI phy problems. > I have to do other business ventures because being an independent > developer/contract no longer can pay the bills. More proof that free > drivers and free software still has a cost to somebody. Sure. Nobody is asking you to fix it all. I'll go bug SI as I've already got the needed hooks in the 2.4 core code (although not 2.5 since the taskfile stuff needs to get resolved first). Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/