Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S979711AbdDYBn2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:43:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:51682 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S979552AbdDYBnR (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:43:17 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org C2260612F1 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=okaya@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / GED: use late init to allow other drivers init To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <1492813704-32280-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , Timur Tabi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Linux Kernel Mailing List From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: <0601c14c-ce5c-a181-0801-4a64a0a3c7be@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:43:13 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 565 Lines: 17 > My point is that nothing guarantees a specific ordering or timing of > module loading in general, so moving stuff to different initcall > levels does not really help 100% of the time. > Are you talking about init vs. probe in general? Sorry, I'm trying to decode what you mean to see if there is some other behavior that I'm not aware of in ACPI. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.