From: "Jeremy Salch" <salch@tblx.net>
To: "'Stewart Smith'" <stewart@linux.org.au>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Access past end of device
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:14:29 -0500
Message-ID: <001f01c32abc$c2d47e70$9fdeae3f@TBLXM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20030604170215.GA9732@cancer>
Importance: Normal
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1355
Lines: 38

Ok I'll give that a try.  One other question.  If the partitiontable was bad
wouldn't fdisk report a incorrect size for the partitions that are having
the problems ?

Also the system freezes when under a heavy load without giving any error
output. What it does do is report something like 600000% idle time in top  


-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Smith [mailto:stewart@linux.org.au] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Jeremy Salch
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Access past end of device


On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:13:02AM -0500, Jeremy Salch wrote:
> I'm using a dell powerall web 120 with scsi drives installed Using 
> redhat 7.2 with the 2.4.18-19.7.x kernel installed
> 
> Attempt to access beyond end of device
> 08:06: rw=0, want=1044196, limit=1044193
> 1044192
> Pass completed, 1 bad blocks found.
> And fdisk reports there to be 1044193+ blocks in the partition ?

Sounds like the partition map is a bit incorrect.

Try running badblocks on the drive itself (/dev/hda, not hda1). If the
problem disappears then it's with the partition map (i'd guess).

- stew

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/