Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1428480AbdDYMPU (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:15:20 -0400 Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:47082 "EHLO thoth.sbs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S975402AbdDYMPK (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:15:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] stmmac: Add support for SIMATIC IOT2000 platform To: Andy Shevchenko References: <8c536123-6189-e0b6-1977-dc7a521718dd@siemens.com> <42fd4a72-526c-cbd9-52db-9d8b495035ee@siemens.com> <3eae5626-1ef2-03ae-635e-27faed085c68@siemens.com> Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , netdev , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Sascha Weisenberger From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <5705c598-7721-fca5-d4e3-8a1a88907173@siemens.com> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:15:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1704 Lines: 43 On 2017-04-25 13:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2017-04-25 12:07, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2017-04-25 11:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> On 2017-04-25 09:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>>>> On 2017-04-24 23:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>> { >>>> .name = "SIMATIC IOT2000", >>>> .func = 6, >>>> .phy_addr = 1, >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> .name = "SIMATIC IOT2000", >>>> .func = 7, >>>> .phy_addr = 1, >>>> }, >>>> >>>> That's all what you need. >>> >>> Nope. Again: the asset tag is the way to tell both apart AND to ensure >>> that we do not match on future devices. > >> To be more verbose: your version (which is our old one) would even >> enable the second, not connected port on the IOT2020. Incorrectly. > > So, name has 2000 for 2020 device? It's clear bug in DMI table you have. :-( > > What else do you have in DMI which can be used to distinguish those devices? Andy, there are devices out there in the field, if we as engineers like it or not, that are all called "IOT2000" although they are sightly different inside. This patch accounts for that. And it does that even without adding "platform_data" hacks like in other patches of mine. ;) Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux