Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:52:36 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Cc: "Budankov, Alexey" <alexey.budankov@intel.com>,
        "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] optimize ctx switch with rb-tree
Message-ID: <20170426105236.GJ27156@leverpostej>
References: <20170110102502.106187-1-davidcc@google.com>
 <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077536E6010@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <CALcN6miYEYaxnSshy78mduOureT1kYNo6OLunwbjVPZvSnCogg@mail.gmail.com>
 <E3138441316DDA4991F87D33FA402D40678033B3@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <CALcN6mir0jMw+=AQQhXmvFi+sJPGtbUkAFWhRUkjrOg7GgO7_w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALcN6mir0jMw+=AQQhXmvFi+sJPGtbUkAFWhRUkjrOg7GgO7_w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 294
Lines: 12

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:54:36AM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
 
> Yes, seems like it would benefit from the rb-tree optimization.

> If you guys want to work on it, I'll be happy to help review.

Likewise.

I'd very much appreciate being Cc'd on changes in this area.

Thanks,
Mark.