Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S3001122AbdDZO01 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:26:27 -0400
Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com ([209.85.214.54]:38482 "EHLO
        mail-it0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1948790AbdDZO0T (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:26:19 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3257d22879148692da6887f89843389bd37ee877.1493060870.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
References: <CAHp75VefVpwf-Ooom9Am3Gfmc8zR31fqWxTzYXest_+YTOk2yg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3257d22879148692da6887f89843389bd37ee877.1493060870.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:26:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkda-GxRLJ=RHhDLRiu_ub=mpibQ7UPXg0=p-7jwJKpK5kg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: gpio-wcove: fix GPIO IRQ status mask
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        Bin Gao <bin.gao@intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
        "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        sathyaosid@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 638
Lines: 18

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:15 PM,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>
> According to Whiskey Cove PMIC spec, bit 7 of GPIOIRQ0_REG belongs to
> battery IO. So we should skip this bit when checking for GPIO IRQ pending
> status. Otherwise, wcove_gpio_irq_handler() might go into the infinite
> loop until IRQ "pending" status becomes 0. This patch fixes this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

Looks fine to me, tentatively applied.

Bin, Mika, Andy, OK?

Yours,
Linus Walleij