Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264340AbTFEArt (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:47:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264343AbTFEArt (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:47:49 -0400 Received: from vladimir.pegasys.ws ([64.220.160.58]:45840 "EHLO vladimir.pegasys.ws") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264340AbTFEArs (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:47:48 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:58:19 -0700 From: jw schultz To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: size of... (was: lk-changelog.pl 0.124) Message-ID: <20030605005819.GC19053@pegasys.ws> Mail-Followup-To: jw schultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030604190143.3314F89AEA@merlin.emma.line.org> <20030604190553.GA8666@merlin.emma.line.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030604190553.GA8666@merlin.emma.line.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 807 Lines: 21 On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:05:53PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > BTW, what is the maximum size that people will bear for linux-kernel > mails? This damn Perl script has grown damn big... I think you are very close to the limit. I'd consider splitting the script up a bit. Put the %addresses hash into a separate file perhaps. You also might just post the changlog and diffs. -- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.ws Remember Cernan and Schmitt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/