Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1165775AbdD1Pq5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:46:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:33224 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1164805AbdD1Pqu (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:46:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: fix uninitialized variable warning for overlay test To: Arnd Bergmann , Rob Herring References: <20170428094429.2396195-1-arnd@arndb.de> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Frank Rowand Message-ID: <590363CD.7000404@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 08:46:21 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170428094429.2396195-1-arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1214 Lines: 37 On 04/28/17 02:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > gcc warns that an empty device tree would cause undefined behavior: > > drivers/of/unittest.c: In function 'of_unittest': > drivers/of/unittest.c:2199:25: warning: 'last_sibling' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > > This adds an initialization of the variable to zero, which we handle > correctly. > > Fixes: 81d0848fc8d2 ("of: Add unit tests for applying overlays") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > drivers/of/unittest.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c > index 12597ff8cfb0..6b8f3e6aa43c 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c > +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c > @@ -2192,7 +2192,7 @@ static __init void of_unittest_overlay_high_level(void) > > mutex_lock(&of_mutex); > > - for (np = of_root->child; np; np = np->sibling) > + for (last_sibling = np = of_root->child; np; np = np->sibling) > last_sibling = np; > > if (last_sibling) > Thanks Arnd! Linux-next also reported this and I sent Rob a different patch for it yesterday. Rob, I am fine with either Arnd's patch or mine, they both fix the problem. -Frank