Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1166200AbdD2F0u (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2017 01:26:50 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37677 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1165189AbdD2F0n (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2017 01:26:43 -0400 Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 07:26:33 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Shiva Kerdel Cc: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: fbtft-core.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL should immediately follow its function Message-ID: <20170429052633.GA11251@kroah.com> References: <20170428230734.14533-1-shiva@exdev.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170428230734.14533-1-shiva@exdev.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2215 Lines: 72 On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:07:34AM +0200, Shiva Kerdel wrote: > This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning > - EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable > > Signed-off-by: Shiva Kerdel > --- > drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c > index b742ee7..b004a4d 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c > @@ -275,23 +275,31 @@ static int fbtft_backlight_get_brightness(struct backlight_device *bd) > return bd->props.brightness; > } > > +static const struct backlight_ops fbtft_bl_ops = { > + .get_brightness = fbtft_backlight_get_brightness, > + .update_status = fbtft_backlight_update_status, > +}; > +#endif > + > void fbtft_unregister_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) > { > + #ifdef CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT Ick, no, does this really look like good style? > + > if (par->info->bl_dev) { > par->info->bl_dev->props.power = FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN; > backlight_update_status(par->info->bl_dev); > backlight_device_unregister(par->info->bl_dev); > par->info->bl_dev = NULL; > } > -} > > -static const struct backlight_ops fbtft_bl_ops = { > - .get_brightness = fbtft_backlight_get_brightness, > - .update_status = fbtft_backlight_update_status, > -}; > + #endif > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_unregister_backlight); > > void fbtft_register_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) > { > + #ifdef CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT > + > struct backlight_device *bd; > struct backlight_properties bl_props = { 0, }; > > @@ -320,13 +328,10 @@ void fbtft_register_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) > > if (!par->fbtftops.unregister_backlight) > par->fbtftops.unregister_backlight = fbtft_unregister_backlight; > + > + #endif > } > -#else > -void fbtft_register_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) { }; > -void fbtft_unregister_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) { }; > -#endif > EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_register_backlight); > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_unregister_backlight); The original code here is fine, please leave it as-is. thanks, greg k-h