Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129636AbRCAPSi>; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:18:38 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129638AbRCAPS2>; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:18:28 -0500
Received: from cr481834-a.ktchnr1.on.wave.home.com ([24.42.218.237]:31984 "EHLO
	scotch.homeip.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129636AbRCAPSV>; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:18:21 -0500
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:26:46 -0500 (EST)
From: God <atm@pinky.penguinpowered.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Stable Version?
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103011008550.918-100000@scotch.homeip.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Hello,

I'll make this quick as I know how much traffic this list gets.

What version of the 2.4.x kernels is actually stable enough to use?  I
ask this because I see 2.4.2, but then the 2.4.2ac7 fix which from what I
have read on here, is a pretty important patch.   Is 2.4.2 or 2.4.1 stable
enough?  

I don't run a large site, but what I do have, I think would
benefit very much from the improved 2.4.x kernel over what I have mostly
have now, of 2.2.16's and 2.2.18's (if not for the the network stuff
alone).



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/