Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:32:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:31:40 -0500 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([204.178.40.224]:50048 "EHLO chaos.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:31:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:31:07 -0500 (EST) From: "Richard B. Johnson" Reply-To: root@chaos.analogic.com To: God cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Stable Version? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, God wrote: > > Hello, > > I'll make this quick as I know how much traffic this list gets. > > What version of the 2.4.x kernels is actually stable enough to use? I have been running 2.4.1 on 12 SMP machines with minimal problems. All these machines are SCSI (no IDE is even enabled in the BIOS). SCSI is aic7xxx and BusLogic. Network cards, 3c59x, eepro100, pcnet32. All the machines are daily hard-at-word. One is our main name-server. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.1 on an i686 machine (799.53 BogoMips). "Memory is like gasoline. You use it up when you are running. Of course you get it all back when you reboot..."; Actual explanation obtained from the Micro$oft help desk. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/