Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265291AbTFFDlk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2003 23:41:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265292AbTFFDlk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2003 23:41:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.12]:13189 "EHLO smtp.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265291AbTFFDlj (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2003 23:41:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:55:11 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: BK->CVS back up Message-ID: <20030606035511.GA16184@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0.6, required 7, AWL, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 687 Lines: 14 I recreated the trees from scratch. I did not do extensive checks to make sure these are OK but I did checkout the head of both the 2.4 and the 2.5 CVS trees and diffed them against the BK tree and they were the same. No promises that the revision numbers stayed the same so if things seem weird throw away your CVS workspace and check them out again. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/