Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751245AbdFAUoV (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:44:21 -0400
Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:44723 "EHLO radon.swed.at"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751128AbdFAUoU (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:44:20 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with
 libpthread.a
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
References: <20170524003232.14319-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
 <e2c13a8b-d0c3-74d1-dd1b-53a56f609c76@nod.at>
 <9f58b41d-ebe4-62a6-1aa4-e9222372ce86@gmail.com>
 <408132c9-6d55-7cba-e09a-f532d7fb9c6f@gmail.com>
 <9617f203-cee2-96cf-aa76-8f42b1a4a9f6@nod.at>
 <2c362d49-9907-7a66-67ef-e196dddea32a@gmail.com>
 <85f8b8c0-cf0e-3c67-c237-be4b045c617b@nod.at>
 <f57b5906-30cc-0fdf-893c-39e4f5202d1b@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)" 
        <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
        "open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)" 
        <user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Message-ID: <07b61d6a-33af-be0a-b57c-843196d0d151@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:44:17 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f57b5906-30cc-0fdf-893c-39e4f5202d1b@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1085
Lines: 25

Am 01.06.2017 um 22:40 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>>> Sure, but that seems orthogonal? In the absence of an answer from Eli,
>>> either you could take my patch or just send reverts of Eli's two
>>> commits, whichever you prefer.
>>
>> Or you and Thomas could investigate. :-)
> 
> Honestly, I don't know what do you want me to investigate, my host
> machine is old (2.6.32) and does not support PTRACE_GETREGSET or
> friends, nor does it have _xstate, so with that, we either don't use
> those period, which would be a revert, or we just conditionally build
> support for that (my patch) and everyone is happy.

This is exactly why we have this mess right now. Everybody is just focusing
on his own stuff.

> I don't know what the issue Thomas is having (he is now CC'd) and I
> still don't understand why you insist on conflating the symbol clash
> while statically linking with support for newer x86 FPU stuff...

The said commits introduced issues, you face some, Thomas is facing some.
I want them to get fixed or at least understood before we apply new patches.

Thanks,
//richard