Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261305AbTFFMRm (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:17:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261308AbTFFMRm (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:17:42 -0400 Received: from daffy.hulpsystems.net ([64.246.21.252]:34188 "EHLO daffy.hulpsystems.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261305AbTFFMRl (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:17:41 -0400 Message-ID: <1054902687.3ee0899f6f6f7@support.tuxbox.dk> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 14:31:27 +0200 From: Martin List-Petersen To: Stefan Smietanowski Cc: uaca@alumni.uv.es, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SCO's claims seem empty References: <1054512915.1620.2.camel@localhost> <200306020119.h521Jbdv003050@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> <20030602111037.GA32253@pusa.informat.uv.es> <3EDB33F8.9060507@stesmi.com> In-Reply-To: <3EDB33F8.9060507@stesmi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2-cvs Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1733 Lines: 48 Citat Stefan Smietanowski : > uaca@alumni.uv.es wrote: > > Hello everybody > > > > > > let me speculate what we will see when SCO shows their "assumed proofs" > > > > they will show code of the kernel and they will claim that was previously > on > > SCO's operating system (and was made by them without a GPL license), > > > > how to refute that? > > Take the subsystem which they show code that "look! They stole it from > us!" and look at how it has developed over time, including this very > mailing list discussions. I mean. Noone pushed in any subsystem into > the kernel (except linus) and just let it sit there, most were > gradually merged, so should have historical baggage. > > "Look here in 2.0, here we did like this and then during 2.1 it was > changed and in 2.2 it was rewritten to this gradually in these > kernels and in 2.3 we redid it slowly over all of these versions ..." > > How can they refute it? The linux kernel and all the historical versions > are available on the net including at least some of the discussions > behind their incorporation. The other part would in part be discussed > over the IRC, I know. > I agree. Besides this article states confirmation on similar code, still i would say: Did it come from Linux orginally or did it come from SCO ? http://informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=10300314 Regards, Martin List-Petersen martin at list-petersen dot dk -- Today is what happened to yesterday. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/