Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:56:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:55:43 -0500 Received: from mgw-x2.nokia.com ([131.228.20.22]:22999 "EHLO mgw-x2.nokia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:55:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:30:56 +0200 (EET) From: "Matilainen Panu (NRC/Helsinki)" To: ext Andrew Morton cc: Subject: Re: 2.4.x very unstable on 8-way IBM 8500R In-Reply-To: <3A9E3F00.E5667AAC@uow.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, ext Andrew Morton wrote: > "Matilainen Panu (NRC/Helsinki)" wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, ext Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Is it stable with `nmi_watchdog=0'? > > > > If the default value for nmi_watchdog is 0 then no - I added the > > nmi_watchdog=1 just to see if that makes any difference. If it's on by > > default then I'll need to test it that way. > > Default for nmi_watchdog is `enabled'. > > Several people have reported that turning it off with > the `nmi_watchdog=0' LILO option makes systems stable. > Nobody knows why. > > (If nmi_watchdog _does_ make the achine stable, please > tell linux-kernel.). It's too early to say for sure but that seems to have fixed it. Uptime now nearly an hour under loads of 20-30 which is way more than it has been able to stay up before. I'll let you know whether its still up tomorrow. Million thanks for the tip! - Panu - > -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/