Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261985AbTFFQJQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2003 12:09:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261989AbTFFQJQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2003 12:09:16 -0400 Received: from tag.witbe.net ([81.88.96.48]:42505 "EHLO tag.witbe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261985AbTFFQJP (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2003 12:09:15 -0400 From: "Paul Rolland" To: "'Alan Cox'" , "'Martin List-Petersen'" Cc: "'Stefan Smietanowski'" , , "'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" Subject: Re: SCO's claims seem empty Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 18:22:44 +0200 Message-ID: <063301c32c47$ddc792d0$3f00a8c0@witbe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-Reply-To: <1054912403.17190.1.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 665 Lines: 16 And if it is only comments, it could be Sco that has taken then from Linux, without any damage to their code ;-) Paul > If it isn't simply carefully doctored choices designed > mislead clueless analysts. You are also ignoring at least two > other things - code that is common because its from the > reference (eg intel locking code) and code from third party > vendors legitimately supplied to both Linux and SCO. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/