Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751248AbdFCSC3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:02:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:33330 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750991AbdFCSC1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:02:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/34] [media] add Omnivision OV5640 sensor driver To: Sakari Ailus Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, fabio.estevam@nxp.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mchehab@kernel.org, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, nick@shmanahar.org, markus.heiser@darmarIT.de, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, bparrot@ti.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, arnd@arndb.de, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, minghsiu.tsai@mediatek.com, tiffany.lin@mediatek.com, jean-christophe.trotin@st.com, horms+renesas@verge.net.au, niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se, robert.jarzmik@free.fr, songjun.wu@microchip.com, andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Steve Longerbeam References: <1495672189-29164-1-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <1495672189-29164-17-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <20170529155511.GI29527@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20170530065632.GK29527@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> From: Steve Longerbeam Message-ID: Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 11:02:21 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170530065632.GK29527@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3074 Lines: 95 Hi Sakari, On 05/29/2017 11:56 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 02:50:34PM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote: >>> >>> >>>> + >>>> +static int ov5640_s_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct v4l2_subdev *sd = ctrl_to_sd(ctrl); >>>> + struct ov5640_dev *sensor = to_ov5640_dev(sd); >>>> + int ret = 0; >>>> + >>>> + mutex_lock(&sensor->lock); >>> Could you use the same lock for the controls as you use for the rest? Just >>> setting handler->lock after handler init does the trick. >> >> Can you please rephrase, I don't follow. "same lock for the controls as >> you use for the rest" - there's only one device lock owned by this driver >> and I am already using that same lock. > > There's another in the control handler. You could use your own lock for the > control handler as well. I still don't understand. > >> >> >>> >>>> + >>>> +static int ov5640_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int enable) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct ov5640_dev *sensor = to_ov5640_dev(sd); >>>> + int ret = 0; >>>> + >>>> + mutex_lock(&sensor->lock); >>>> + >>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER) >>>> + if (sd->entity.stream_count > 1) >>> The entity stream_count isn't connected to the number of times s_stream(sd, >>> true) is called. Please remove the check. >> >> It's incremented by media_pipeline_start(), even if the entity is already >> a member of the given pipeline. >> >> I added this check because in imx-media, the ov5640 can be streaming >> concurrently to multiple video capture devices, and each capture device >> calls >> media_pipeline_start() at stream on, which increments the entity stream >> count. >> >> So if one capture device issues a stream off while others are still >> streaming, >> ov5640 should remain at stream on. So the entity stream count is being >> used as a streaming usage counter. Is there a better way to do this? Should >> I use a private stream use counter instead? > > Different drivers may use media_pipeline_start() in different ways. Stream > control shouldn't depend on that count. This could cause issues in using the > driver with other ISP / receiver drivers. > > I think it should be enough to move the check to the imx driver in this > case. I will remove this check. >>>> + >>>> +static int ov5640_remove(struct i2c_client *client) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client); >>>> + struct ov5640_dev *sensor = to_ov5640_dev(sd); >>>> + >>>> + regulator_bulk_disable(OV5640_NUM_SUPPLIES, sensor->supplies); >>> Ditto. >> >> I don't understand. regulator_bulk_disable() is still needed, am I missing >> something? > > You still need to enable it first. I don't see that being done in probe. As > the driver implements the s_power() op, I don't see a need for powering the > device on at probe time (and conversely off at remove time). Oh you're right, it must have been left over from a previous revision I guess. Yes, regulator_bulk_enable|disable() is only called in ov5640_set_power(). I'll remove regulator_bulk_disable() from probe/remove. Steve