Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751252AbdFCSSS (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:18:18 -0400
Received: from mail-qt0-f195.google.com ([209.85.216.195]:36493 "EHLO
        mail-qt0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751154AbdFCSSP (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:18:15 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAENHMvMF8yOsezMRSYp+4TsVTD9Nnbfm8LJWuX7YccbSL+bsGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1496266871.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
 <20170531070225.bymdhhpclidwwtpt@dell> <3e58ab749a67cce5c956ef13db8563fb0a8bc190.1496266871.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
 <CAHp75Vd5uPmz-0uyPcwYaqyGZhC7caHWj5PbfMJTzSQ6G+1o3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAENHMvOzo0e5gs+DzK3ZNL7BbenhpZZCCbmT5kAjpWq-679UOQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VdQyCMzTyPVkbfr6teEugxEmKuDOe5Qk51bDvoNjTay+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAENHMvMF8yOsezMRSYp+4TsVTD9Nnbfm8LJWuX7YccbSL+bsGQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 21:18:13 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcQfSkn7NAWSC2Vq=8RCC0M1p9zvVFjJFLyEo17GDvHsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] thermal: intel_bxt_pmic_thermal: Use first level
 PMIC thermal irq
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan <sathyaosid@gmail.com>
Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
        "Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        "edubezval@gmail.com" <edubezval@gmail.com>,
        "dvhart@infradead.org" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
        "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        USB <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 913
Lines: 26

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
<sathyaosid@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
>> <sathyaosid@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Let's assume we applied patches 1 and 2, does it mean the regression
>> to the existing behaviour?
>
> Yes, Just applying patch 1 & 2 and not apply patch 3 will create
> regression in thermal driver.
>
> Since there is no compilation dependency between patch 2 & 3 and they
> are from two different domains, I submitted them separately to make it
> easier for review.

And this is exactly bisectability (level 2 :-) ) issue.
Basically you confirmed you need to squash them like I said.

>> (For example, device worked improperly in some cases -> stopped
>> working completely)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko