Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751452AbdFDSvZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2017 14:51:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49956 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751201AbdFDSvV (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2017 14:51:21 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 4D760C0467C0 Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jolsa@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 4D760C0467C0 Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:51:19 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Thomas-Mich Richter Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting Message-ID: <20170604185057.GA18648@krava> References: <20170601123441.24581-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170601132038.GG2899@kernel.org> <20170601210451.GA5713@krava> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Sun, 04 Jun 2017 18:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1066 Lines: 35 On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:58:46AM +0200, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote: SNBIP > > I started fixing it some time ago, but got distracted, if you are > > interested, you're welcome to pick up from my branch ;-) > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git > > perf/attr_test > > > > thanks, > > jirka > > > > I have started work on perf tool very recently to get s390 support > working and up to date. > > I downloaded your branch and discovered you have already fixed > another issue I run into this week. For example > commit 070b9644981e ("perf tests attr: Do not store failed events") > > I can certainly help you to get this test case operational again. > Maybe you need to pull some of your patches out of your backlog > and submit them the kernel to get to a common base to work on. > > I suggest we should move the discussion to the linux-perf-users > mailing list. > > Your thoughts? good idea, for me it'd be best if you pull them and change them as you see fit.. I dont think I'll get to it any time soon thanks, jirka