Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751496AbdFDSv4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2017 14:51:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52544 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751212AbdFDSvx (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2017 14:51:53 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com A525B83F40 Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jolsa@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com A525B83F40 Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:51:50 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Thomas-Mich Richter , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting Message-ID: <20170604185141.GB18648@krava> References: <20170601123441.24581-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170601132038.GG2899@kernel.org> <20170601210451.GA5713@krava> <20170602140936.GO2899@kernel.org> <20170602141105.GP2899@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170602141105.GP2899@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Sun, 04 Jun 2017 18:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 581 Lines: 21 On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:11:05AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: SNIP > > > > > > I suggest we should move the discussion to the linux-perf-users > > > mailing list. > > > > > > Your thoughts? > > > > If you have specific patches in Jiri's branch that you think are good to > > go, just point me to them and I'll cherry-pick them. > > > > I'm looking now at the one you pointed out above (070b9644981e). > > Just looked, but the cset comment should state what is the problem and > how it is solved, right now it has just a one line summary :-\ yep, sry ;-) jirka