Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 22:25:54 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>, kernel-team@fb.com,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] mm, oom: refactor select_bad_process() to
 take memcg as an argument
Message-ID: <20170604192553.GA19980@esperanza>
References: <1496342115-3974-1-git-send-email-guro@fb.com>
 <1496342115-3974-2-git-send-email-guro@fb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1496342115-3974-2-git-send-email-guro@fb.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 768
Lines: 15

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 07:35:09PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> The select_bad_process() function will be used further
> to select a process to kill in the victim cgroup.
> This cgroup doesn't necessary match oc->memcg,
> which is a cgroup, which limits were caused cgroup-wide OOM
> (or NULL in case of global OOM).
> 
> So, refactor select_bad_process() to take a pointer to
> a cgroup to iterate over as an argument.

IMHO this patch, as well as patches 2-5, doesn't deserve to be submitted
separately: none of them make sense as a separate change; worse, patches
4 and 5 introduce user API that doesn't do anything without patch 6. All
of the changes are relatively small and singling them out doesn't really
facilitate review, so I'd merge them all in patch 6.