Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 08:41:17 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] vt: get rid of worst cases of __put_user/__get_user
Message-ID: <20170605064117.GD14680@kroah.com>
References: <20170603073255.zgpfmdp2pqusz4qw@angband.pl>
 <20170603154252.GA5123@kroah.com>
 <20170605061350.GR6365@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170605061350.GR6365@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1192
Lines: 29

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 07:13:50AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 12:42:52AM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 09:32:55AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > In a recent discussion, Linus and Al Viro said quite a bit of expletives
> > > about __put_user() and __get_user(), that it's a bad interface that's
> > > almost always the wrong thing to use:
> > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149463725626316&w=2
> > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149465866929092&w=2
> > > 
> > > Here's a few patches applying the lessons from that discussion to vt.
> > > None of the uses is performance-critical, but at least we get a nice bit
> > > of code simplification.  And, it's a start of manual review + conversion
> > > that Al Viro wants.
> > 
> > Ah, nice work, at first glance these all look good to me.  I'll queue
> > them up on Monday.
> 
> Could you put that into a separate no-rebase branch?  Or I could do that
> in vfs.git, for that matter...

If you just want to take these in vfs.git feel free to, I don't mind at
all:
	Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
that's probably the easiest.

thanks,

greg k-h