Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262306AbTFFWEn (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2003 18:04:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262312AbTFFWEm (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2003 18:04:42 -0400 Received: from daffy.hulpsystems.net ([64.246.21.252]:12705 "EHLO daffy.hulpsystems.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262306AbTFFWEk (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2003 18:04:40 -0400 Subject: Re: SCO's claims seem empty From: Martin List-Petersen To: Alan Cox Cc: Stefan Smietanowski , uaca@alumni.uv.es, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1054912403.17190.1.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <1054512915.1620.2.camel@localhost> <200306020119.h521Jbdv003050@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> <20030602111037.GA32253@pusa.informat.uv.es> <3EDB33F8.9060507@stesmi.com> <1054902687.3ee0899f6f6f7@support.tuxbox.dk> <1054912403.17190.1.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5f6eV6vYB0KYgkSH0gDv" Organization: Message-Id: <1054937877.6388.32.camel@loke> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 07 Jun 2003 00:17:57 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1665 Lines: 50 --=-5f6eV6vYB0KYgkSH0gDv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 17:13, Alan Cox wrote: > On Gwe, 2003-06-06 at 13:31, Martin List-Petersen wrote > > Besides this article states confirmation on similar code, still i would= say: Did > > it come from Linux orginally or did it come from SCO ? > >=20 > > http://informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=3D10300314 >=20 > If it isn't simply carefully doctored choices designed mislead clueless > analysts. You are also ignoring at least two other things - code that is > common because its from the reference (eg intel locking code) and code > from third party vendors legitimately supplied to both Linux and SCO. I'm just pushing it here. Of course this code could be from anywhere and th= at's exactly the point. Wouldn't wonder me if some code was legitimate both used in Linux and SCO t= hat came from outside. Regards, Martin List-Petersen martin at list-petersen dot dk -- In like a dimwit, out like a light. -- Pogo --=-5f6eV6vYB0KYgkSH0gDv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+4RMVzAGaxP8W1ugRAmv4AJ0TE1R++sgVWfKMq7OTk4luONKbqACgowAE vn735rJmBw+B4UsTpi/LLnQ= =n1lc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5f6eV6vYB0KYgkSH0gDv-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/