Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751510AbdFFPjO (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2017 11:39:14 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:42406 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751404AbdFFPjN (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2017 11:39:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:39:07 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Joe Perches Cc: David Kershner , Andy Whitcroft , corbet@lwn.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jes.sorensen@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org, sparmaintainer@unisys.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] move visorbus out of staging to drivers/virt/visorbus Message-ID: <20170606153907.GA3243@kroah.com> References: <1496693252-4349-1-git-send-email-david.kershner@unisys.com> <20170606144909.GA31938@kroah.com> <20170606145322.GA32397@kroah.com> <1496763229.1968.20.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1496763229.1968.20.camel@perches.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1417 Lines: 46 On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 08:33:49AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 16:53 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 04:49:09PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > I noticed that in drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c, you > > > have 2 tabs for your 'struct attribute' variables, which is really odd. > [] > > Also, many of the attribute callbacks in that file seem to all have > > their leading '{' in the wrong place. Odd that checkpatch.pl doesn't > > catch that... > > checkpatch doesn't really check much about inconsistent > indentation. I believe the only new statement indentation > check is after an if. > > For instance, checkpatch doesn't emit a warning on this code: > > struct foo { > int bar; > }; > > struct foo *alloc_foo(void) > { > struct foo *baz = malloc(sizeof(struct foo)); > if (baz) > baz->bar = 1; > return baz; > } Ok, but the following code in that file should be caught, right: static ssize_t partition_handle_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { struct visor_device *vdev = to_visor_device(dev); u64 handle = visorchannel_get_clientpartition(vdev->visorchannel); return sprintf(buf, "0x%llx\n", handle); } static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(partition_handle); The initial { is in the wrong place... thanks, greg k-h