Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751478AbdFFWUp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:20:45 -0400
Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com ([209.85.213.42]:33938 "EHLO
        mail-vk0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751399AbdFFWUo (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:20:44 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170606173116.13977-1-bp@alien8.de>
References: <20170606173116.13977-1-bp@alien8.de>
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:20:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CALCETrWEGgOaSWknQBsGED+iUv0HhFfaNoug+BWOGqSxSdCa1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ldt: Rename ldr_struct.size to .n_entries
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 395
Lines: 11

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
>
> ... because this is exactly what it is: the number of entries in the
> LDT. Calling it "size" is simply confusing and it is actually begging
> to be called "n_entries" or somesuch, especially if you see constructs
> like:

In the subject: ldt_struct, perhaps?

Otherwise looks good.