Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 09:43:12 +0800
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
To: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@collabora.co.uk>
CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
        Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@collabora.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:USB PHY LAYER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] usb-phy-generic: Add support to SMSC USB3315
Message-ID: <20170607014312.GA10588@b29397-desktop>
References: <1495563396.12055.93.camel@collabora.co.uk>
 <20170523210022.GN20170@codeaurora.org>
 <1495708587.12055.97.camel@collabora.co.uk>
 <1495789230.12055.104.camel@collabora.co.uk>
 <20170602220010.GQ20170@codeaurora.org>
 <1496653020.31741.2.camel@collabora.co.uk>
 <20170605094330.GA21071@b29397-desktop>
 <1496656346.31741.4.camel@collabora.co.uk>
 <20170606015528.GB26189@b29397-desktop>
 <1496770570.22734.3.camel@collabora.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1496770570.22734.3.camel@collabora.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2017 01:43:09.2501
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5afe0b00-7697-4969-b663-5eab37d5f47e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=5afe0b00-7697-4969-b663-5eab37d5f47e;Ip=[192.88.158.2];Helo=[az84smr01.freescale.net]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR03MB167
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 7205
Lines: 185

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 07:36:10PM +0200, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 09:55 +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 17:43 +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 10:57:00AM +0200, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 15:00 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > > > On 05/26, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I modify ci_hrdc_imx_probe to bypass?"data->phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev-
> > > > > > > >dev,
> > > > > > > "fsl,usbphy", 0);". Everything works as expected and call ci_ulpi_init.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The problem is that in ci_ulpi_init, before calling "ci->ulpi =
> > > > > > > ulpi_register_interface(ci-
> > > > > > > > dev,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > &ci->ulpi_ops);" (to initialize our phy), "hw_phymode_configure(ci);" is called which is
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > original function that make our system to hang.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Our phy is not initialised before calling ulpi_register_interface so I don't understand
> > > > > > > how
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > phy
> > > > > > > can reply if it is not out of reset state.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I haven't see any problem in hw_phymode_configure(). What's the
> > > > > > value of ci->platdata->phy_mode? USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI? If
> > > > > > you phy needs to be taken out of reset to reply to the ulpi reads
> > > > > > of the vendor/product ids, then it sounds like you have a similar
> > > > > > situation to what I had. I needed to turn on some regulators to
> > > > > > get those reads to work, otherwise they would fail, but knowing
> > > > > > what needed to be turned on basically meant I needed to probe the
> > > > > > ulpi driver so probing the ids wasn't going to be useful. So on
> > > > > > my device the reads for the ids go through, but they get all
> > > > > > zeroes back, which is actually ok because there aren't any bits
> > > > > > set on my devices anyway. After the reads see 0, we fallback to
> > > > > > DT matching, which avoids the "bring it out of reset/power it on"
> > > > > > sorts of problems entirely.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes the phy mode is configured to USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI.
> > > > > Indeed, this phy need to be out of reset to work. For example everything works fine if I
> > > > > call?
> > > > > "_ci_usb_phy_init(ci);" before calling "hw_phymode_configure(ci);"
> > > > > This function only init reset GPIO and clock.
> > > > > 
> > > > > For information, the original patch I have to fix the issue:
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > > index 79ad8e9..21aaff1 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > > @@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ static int ci_usb_phy_init(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> > > > > ?	case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_UTMI:
> > > > > ?	case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_UTMIW:
> > > > > ?	case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_HSIC:
> > > > > +	case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI:
> > > > > ?		ret = _ci_usb_phy_init(ci);
> > > > > ?		if (!ret)
> > > > > ?			hw_wait_phy_stable();
> > > > > @@ -398,7 +399,6 @@ static int ci_usb_phy_init(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> > > > > ?			return ret;
> > > > > ?		hw_phymode_configure(ci);
> > > > > ?		break;
> > > > > -	case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI:
> > > > > ?	case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SERIAL:
> > > > > ?		hw_phymode_configure(ci);
> > > > > ?		ret = _ci_usb_phy_init(ci);
> > > > > --?
> > > > 
> > > > Currently, the hw_phymode_configure is called twice for ULPI PHY, the
> > > > two execution are between _ci_usb_phy_init, would you test which one
> > > > causes hang? If the second causes hang, you can make a patch for
> > > > hw_phymode_configure that if the required PORTSC_PTS is the same
> > > > the value in register, do noop.
> > > 
> > > The first one hangs,?_ci_usb_phy_init is not called due to hang.
> > > 
> > 
> > So, you need to comment out hw_phymode_configure at ci_ulpi_init, and you
> > can't get vid/pid correctly, right? If it is, we may need to add power on
> > sequence at chipidea core driver (ci_hdrc_probe) for clock and reset things.
> > 
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg157134.html
> > 
> > I am wondering if we can call ci_usb_phy_init before calling ci_ulpi_init,
> > since we need to let hardware be ready before reading vid/pid.
> > Stephen & Fabien, does that work for you?
> > 
> 
> I test the following patch and it works. But I am not sure that we can move safely ci_ulpi_init.
> I will investigate more tomorrow if it is a problem for other phys.
> 
> Is it a good approach?
> 
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] power on phy before getting vid/pid
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@collabora.co.uk>
> ---
> ?drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 12 ++++++++----
> ?drivers/usb/chipidea/ulpi.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> ?2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> index 79ad8e9..26889e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> @@ -879,10 +879,6 @@ static int ci_hdrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ?		return -ENODEV;
> ?	}
> ?
> -	ret = ci_ulpi_init(ci);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> ?	if (ci->platdata->phy) {
> ?		ci->phy = ci->platdata->phy;
> ?	} else if (ci->platdata->usb_phy) {
> @@ -909,6 +905,14 @@ static int ci_hdrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ?			ci->usb_phy = NULL;
> ?	}
> ?
> +	/*?
> +	???We move this in order to have phy reset and gpio information
> +	???before calling ci_ulpi_init.
> +	*/
> +	ret = ci_ulpi_init(ci);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> ?	ret = ci_usb_phy_init(ci);
> ?	if (ret) {
> ?		dev_err(dev, "unable to init phy: %d\n", ret);
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ulpi.c
> index 1219583..1c272e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ulpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ulpi.c
> @@ -73,9 +73,28 @@ static int ci_ulpi_write(struct device *dev, u8 addr, u8 val)
> ?
> ?int ci_ulpi_init(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> ?{
> +????????int ret;
> ?	if (ci->platdata->phy_mode != USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_ULPI)
> ?		return 0;
> ?
> +	/*?
> +	???This is the content of _ci_usb_phy_init from core.c to power on the phy.
> +	???Duplicated for test purpose only.
> +	*/
> +	if (ci->phy) {
> +		ret = phy_init(ci->phy);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		ret = phy_power_on(ci->phy);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			phy_exit(ci->phy);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		ret = usb_phy_init(ci->usb_phy);
> +	}
> +
> ?	/*
> ?	?* Set PORTSC correctly so we can read/write ULPI registers for
> ?	?* identification purposes

Your above patch is not accepted. I don't know ULPI PHY behavior at
imx53, would you please make clear below things:

- Before setting phy mode at portsc, which you need to do?
  If they can't be in phy_init, you may register a power sequence
  instance.
- Can you read pid/vid correctly, and which way you would
  like to match your ulpi device, pid/vid or using device
  tree, see ulpi_match

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen