Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263922AbTFGWrz (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:47:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263938AbTFGWrz (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:47:55 -0400 Received: from modemcable204.207-203-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.203.207.204]:6274 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263922AbTFGWrz (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:47:55 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:50:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Russell King cc: Anton Blanchard , "" Subject: Re: irq consolidation In-Reply-To: <20030607101848.A22665@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <20030607040515.GB28914@krispykreme> <20030607044803.GE28914@krispykreme> <20030607101848.A22665@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 773 Lines: 21 On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Russell King wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:48:03PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > We are hoping to kill irq_desc[NR_IRQS] completely and instead allocate > > them on demand with some sort of hash to map an interrupt number to an > > irq_desc. Anton don't you have an NR_IRQS sized interrupt stub you have to deal with on PPC64? I was considering perhaps only statically allocating the 0-15 on i386 just to get it booting and then dynamically allocate the rest. Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/