Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129758AbRCASZ0>; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:25:26 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129759AbRCASZR>; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:25:17 -0500
Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:42510 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129758AbRCASZE>; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:25:04 -0500
Subject: Re: Stable Version?
To: atm@pinky.penguinpowered.com (God)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 18:28:01 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103011008550.918-100000@scotch.homeip.net> from "God" at Mar 01, 2001 10:26:46 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E14YXo6-0008H7-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> What version of the 2.4.x kernels is actually stable enough to use?  I
> ask this because I see 2.4.2, but then the 2.4.2ac7 fix which from what I
> have read on here, is a pretty important patch.   Is 2.4.2 or 2.4.1 stable
> enough?  

2.4.1 definitely isnt. 2.4.2 doesnt seem too bad for many users. In fact for
lots of people its running quite nicely. Its by no means as stable as 2.2.18
tho


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/