Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264412AbTFHDSS (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jun 2003 23:18:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264432AbTFHDSS (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jun 2003 23:18:18 -0400 Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.239]:24845 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264412AbTFHDSR (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jun 2003 23:18:17 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 00:31:40 -0300 From: Werner Almesberger To: "David S. Miller" Cc: chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2) Message-ID: <20030608003140.O3232@almesberger.net> References: <20030606122616.B3232@almesberger.net> <200306070000.h5700OsG002995@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> <20030606210620.G3232@almesberger.net> <20030606.235340.85405522.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030606.235340.85405522.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:53:40PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 752 Lines: 19 David S. Miller wrote: > But not a change in IP address :-) Hmm yes, that might be a bit tricky to handle. Although one could argue that a TCP connection could even exist through this - you just couldn't send or receive traffic while the local address isn't valid. - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/