Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:09:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:09:42 -0500 Received: from idiom.com ([216.240.32.1]:28932 "EHLO idiom.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:09:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3A9E96A6.41D725A3@namesys.com> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 21:36:22 +0300 From: Hans Reiser Organization: Namesys X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Dabney CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: What is 2.4 Linux networking performance like compared to BSD? In-Reply-To: <3A9E72D3.36B28B8F@namesys.com> <20010301090416.E27440@osdlab.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nathan Dabney wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 07:03:31PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote: > > The problem is that I really need BSD vs. Linux experiences, not Linux 2.4 vs. > > 2.2 experiences, because the webcache industry tends to strongly disparage Linux > > networking code, so much better isn't necessarily good enough. > > > > Hans > > Check with the www.swelltech.com people, they should have the info you need. > > http://www.swelltech.com/pengies/joe/squidtuneup/t1.html > > The above link contains some decent squid performance hints for 2.2+Squid. > > -Nathan Dabney It does not say anything about BSD vs. Linux 2.4 networking code. If I can't get information about BSD v. Linux 2.4 networking code, then reiserfs has to get ported to BSD which will be both nice and a pain to do. Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/