Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261454AbTFIKHZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 06:07:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261561AbTFIKHZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 06:07:25 -0400 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:5507 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261454AbTFIKHZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 06:07:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [3/3] PCI segment support From: "David S. Miller" To: Ivan Kokshaysky Cc: Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Mosberger In-Reply-To: <20030609140749.A15138@jurassic.park.msu.ru> References: <20030407234411.GT23430@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030408203824.A27019@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20030608164351.GI28581@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030609140749.A15138@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1055154054.9884.2.camel@rth.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 09 Jun 2003 03:20:56 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 689 Lines: 19 On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 03:07, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > Looks good, but shouldn't we pass 'struct pci_bus *' instead > of pci_dev to pci_domain_nr()? I don't think it matters, but someone may find a useful use of having the exact device available, who knows... > Because another place where the domain number must be checked on is > pci_bus_exists(). We could just pass the bus self device in this case. -- David S. Miller - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/