Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751510AbdFHLmA (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:42:00 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:46307 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751427AbdFHLl7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:41:59 -0400 From: Michael Ellerman To: Alexey Kardashevskiy , kbuild test robot , Murilo Opsfelder Araujo Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH In-Reply-To: References: <201706080005.vXjRK5G3%fengguang.wu@intel.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 21:41:53 +1000 Message-ID: <871squemf2.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 277 Lines: 11 Alexey Kardashevskiy writes: > Hi, > > How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make > oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. Hmm, Murilo did you confirm the bug still happens on upstream with that rand config? cheers