Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751904AbdFHOYM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:24:12 -0400
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:56974 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751550AbdFHOYI (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:24:08 -0400
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:24:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20170608.102405.746234218675861415.davem@davemloft.net>
To: hch@lst.de
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
        linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@linux-mips.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/44] sparc: remove arch specific dma_supported
 implementations
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170608132609.32662-29-hch@lst.de>
References: <20170608132609.32662-1-hch@lst.de>
        <20170608132609.32662-29-hch@lst.de>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Thu, 08 Jun 2017 06:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 507
Lines: 12

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Thu,  8 Jun 2017 15:25:53 +0200

> Usually dma_supported decisions are done by the dma_map_ops instance.
> Switch sparc to that model by providing a ->dma_supported instance for
> sbus that always returns false, and implementations tailored to the sun4u
> and sun4v cases for sparc64, and leave it unimplemented for PCI on
> sparc32, which means always supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>