Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
To: will.deacon@arm.com
CC: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
CC: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
CC: albert@sifive.com
CC: patches@groups.riscv.org
Subject: Re: RISC-V Linux Port v2
In-Reply-To: <20170608102632.GE6071@arm.com>
Message-ID: <mhng-5c2e7501-fbce-48a4-ae20-d69cb0660e04@palmer-si-x1c4>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1283
Lines: 29

On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 03:26:32 PDT (-0700), will.deacon@arm.com wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:54:16PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 02:23:42 PDT (-0700), will.deacon@arm.com wrote:
>> > Hi Palmer,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 03:59:50PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> >> Thanks to everyone who has participated in the review process so far.  We've
>> >> made a lot of changes since the v1 and while this isn't ready to go yet, I
>> >> finally managed to get through everything in my inbox so I thought it would be
>> >> a good time to submit a v2 so everyone is on the same page.
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >> [PATCH 13/17] RISC-V: Add include subdirectory
>> >
>> > This guy is too big, and got silently dropped by the mailing list. Any
>> > chance you could split it up please, so that it can be reviewed?
>>
>> Sorry about that.  It's online
>>
>>   https://github.com/riscv/riscv-linux/commit/daaea1609cb5e8c93745c1ce112a06e90f5b663c
>>
>> I'll be sure to split it up next time.  I can submit a v3 if you want?
>
> It looks like you'll be submitting a v3 anyway, so if you could split it up
> for that then it would be much appreciated.

Sounds good.  I won't spin a v3 just for this problem, as there's a lot of
other comments I need to go through.