Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264394AbTFIOmh (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 10:42:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264403AbTFIOmh (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 10:42:37 -0400 Received: from ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil ([134.207.10.161]:58802 "EHLO ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264394AbTFIOmg (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 10:42:36 -0400 Message-Id: <200306091456.h59Eu5sG022768@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> To: "David S. Miller" cc: baldrick@wanadoo.fr, wa@almesberger.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Jun 2003 07:00:14 PDT." <20030609.070014.118613484.davem@redhat.com> X-url: http://www.nrl.navy.mil/CCS/people/chas/index.html X-mailer: nmh 1.0 Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 10:54:13 -0400 From: chas williams X-Spam-Score: (*) hits=1.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1626 Lines: 33 In message <20030609.070014.118613484.davem@redhat.com>,"David S. Miller" write s: > (see latest rfc patch). > >You do know that won't compile with current 2.5.x right? >All the struct sock members got renamed to have a "sk_" prefix >2 days ago :-) i do remember you telling me that. i pulled a new copy of the tree and will get my patch fixed. in the meantime the curious should use a slightly older kernel. >But I did like the general direction you were going in. I can't >comment on things like getting rid of ATM_*_ITF or whatever it's >called because I don't know what that thing does ;) you could say open vcp.vci but i dont care which interface you use. typically you care which atm interface you might exit. they might not be connected to the same network. i can see how this might be useful for load balancing. but even then you still might something smarter to do the selection. perhaps only two interfaces are load balancing. the third might be your dsl uplink. forethought (the marconi atm stack) has an idea of failover groups. you define these as a list of adapters. any adapter in the group can handle a call setup. this works ok for svc's since sigd can take care of the mess. for pvc's i dont entirely see the point. regardless, i think the 'any' interface idea should be handled in user space and the kernel always passed a 'real' interface. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/