Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:26:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:25:53 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:39303 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:25:39 -0500 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15006.41335.378413.427127@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:22:31 -0800 (PST) To: Manfred Spraul Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Q: explicit alignment control for the slab allocator In-Reply-To: <3A9E8628.7CCD1162@colorfullife.com> In-Reply-To: <3A9E8628.7CCD1162@colorfullife.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Manfred, why are you changing the cache alignment to SMP_CACHE_BYTES? If you read the original SLAB papers and other documents, the code intends to color the L1 cache not the L2 or subsidiary caches. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/