Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751721AbdFHVvt (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:51:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:32924 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751416AbdFHVvr (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:51:47 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1B14122CAF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:51:44 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Shuah Khan Cc: Shuah Khan , Masami Hiramatsu , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] selftests/ftrace: Some improvements of ftracetest Message-ID: <20170608175144.205894cb@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <052a7347-be6e-42e2-de5e-6f5849fa1e8e@osg.samsung.com> References: <149551934796.30231.12544755801380678045.stgit@devbox> <4b0b2ac8-dfba-abd9-3dba-bbe73c22f79f@kernel.org> <20170607185628.452a11a1@gandalf.local.home> <8f974157-c2e5-9b39-c55b-b637d6e7814f@osg.samsung.com> <20170608133743.4720e2bc@gandalf.local.home> <8bcf5a87-812a-6ceb-7fa4-ea2d33d4e717@osg.samsung.com> <20170608170844.134e1158@gandalf.local.home> <9a2b4e46-a545-b862-2517-472f364a68b3@osg.samsung.com> <20170608172627.3dab319e@gandalf.local.home> <9be74d50-aee5-4771-a62c-e04156176263@osg.samsung.com> <20170608173946.7c9308f2@gandalf.local.home> <052a7347-be6e-42e2-de5e-6f5849fa1e8e@osg.samsung.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1008 Lines: 27 On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:44:08 -0600 Shuah Khan wrote: > > Also, did you see my reply about having the right config? You have > > HIST_TRIGGERS undefined but yet the histogram trigger tests all pass in > > your report. > > I did see that one. Didn't get a chance to look at that yet. Do you expect > the tests to be skipped in this case? Could it be that tests aren't run? > I will look at this and let you know what I find on my test system. Your first email showed that they passed, which would be hard to do since the feature is not even enabled. ftracetest is very much set up to look at the existing pseudo files to determine if a feature exists or not, and if it does not, it returns "UNSUPPORTED". If it returned PASSED when the feature is not enabled, that would be a big time bug in the test. > > > > > One more thing, is this 100% reproducible. That is, does it always fail? > > > Failed the two times I tried. Great to hear. I like reproducibility :-) -- Steve