Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751580AbdFIHhn (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 03:37:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com ([209.85.128.195]:34055 "EHLO mail-wr0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751505AbdFIHhl (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 03:37:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:37:37 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Hoegeun Kwon Cc: inki.dae@samsung.com, jy0922.shim@samsung.com, sw0312.kim@samsung.com, airlied@linux.ie, kgene@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, javier@osg.samsung.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, a.hajda@samsung.com, andi.shyti@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: dts: exynos: Remove the OF graph from DSI node Message-ID: <20170609073737.GC4018@kozik-book> References: <1488948852-5380-1-git-send-email-hoegeun.kwon@samsung.com> <1488948852-5380-5-git-send-email-hoegeun.kwon@samsung.com> <20170515164829.rfcqj5quw2jooh6u@kozik-lap> <9508dfc9-7cd3-3ed3-f642-2f69a5dcb5ce@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1511 Lines: 49 On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:14:20PM +0900, Hoegeun Kwon wrote: > On 05/19/2017 03:17 PM, Hoegeun Kwon wrote: > >On 05/16/2017 01:48 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 01:54:11PM +0900, Hoegeun Kwon wrote: > >>>The OF graph is not needed because the panel is a child of dsi. Remove > >>>the ports node in DSI node. > >>> > >>>Signed-off-by: Hoegeun Kwon > >>>Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda > >>>Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti > >>>--- > >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi | 14 > >>>-------------- > >>> 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) > >>> > >>Hi, > >> > >>I wanted to apply this (and 5/5) but it seems that DRM change is not > >>merged. Was it included in v4.12-rc1? > >> > >>Best regards, > >>Krzysztof > > > >Hi, > > > >Sorry for my belated reply. > > > >The DRM patch(3/5) is not merged in v4.12-rc1 (mainline)... > >I have checked the David's branch, but not merged. > >However it was merged into Inki's exynos drm branch. > > > >Inki, Could you check the patch(3/5). > > > >Best regards, > >Hoegeun > > Hi Krzysztof, > > The drm patch(3/5) has been merged into v4.12-rc4. Thanks for letting me know. My branch is rebased on v4.12-rc1 so to maintain bisectabiltiy I would have to merge v4.12-rc4... thus making a messy history. It is just a cleanup so I will take it after releasing v4.12, so this will end up in v4.14. No need to resend, I'll keep it in Patchwork. Best regards, Krzysztof