Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751583AbdFIIln (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 04:41:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:33859 "EHLO mail-wm0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751519AbdFIIlh (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 04:41:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:41:34 +0200 From: Christoffer Dall To: Hu Huajun Cc: christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, songwenjun@huawei.com, gengdongjiu@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: ARM64: fix phy counter access failure in guest. Message-ID: <20170609084134.GC6378@cbox> References: <20170609162220.1460-1-huhuajun@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170609162220.1460-1-huhuajun@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1166 Lines: 37 Hi, On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:22:20AM +0800, Hu Huajun wrote: > When reading the cntpct_el0 in guest with VHE (Virtual Host Extension) > enabled in host, the "Unsupported guest sys_reg access" error reported. > The reason is cnthctl_el2.EL1PCTEN is not enabled, which is expected > to be done in kvm_timer_init_vhe(). The problem is kvm_timer_init_vhe > is called by cpu_init_hyp_mode, and which is called when VHE is disabled. > This patch calls kvm_timer_init_vhe() to enable cnthctl_el2.EL1PCTEN > in cpu_hyp_reinit(). > > Signed-off-by: Hu Huajun > --- > virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > index 3417e18..b703741 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > @@ -1137,6 +1137,7 @@ static void cpu_hyp_reinit(void) > * event was cancelled before the CPU was reset. > */ > __cpu_init_stage2(); > + kvm_timer_init_vhe(); > } else { > cpu_init_hyp_mode(NULL); > } > -- > 2.10.1 > Could you rework this patch to remove the incorrect call to kvm_timer_init_vhe() from cpu_init_hyp_mode() as well? Thanks, -Christoffer