Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264453AbTFITNA (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:13:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264455AbTFITNA (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:13:00 -0400 Received: from hematita.dcc.ufmg.br ([150.164.10.11]:16528 "EHLO hematita.dcc.ufmg.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264453AbTFITM7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:12:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:26:01 -0300 (BRT) From: "Leonardo H. Machado" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: cachefs on linux Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1262 Lines: 35 Dear Sirs, I'm using linux and solaris for a while and, after seaching all the web, newsgroups, and mailing lists I could not find the answer for a very simple question. Before emailing Alan Cox or any other guru (that might not answer me) I will try to ask you. Here is my simple question: Why has Solaris a CacheFS file system, while linux doesn't? Is it because cachefs is VERY difficult to implement (It should be no barrier for our gurus), or because there's no such a big demand for this marvelous FS, or else, because no one thought of it? There are certanly some cacheFS implementations around the web, like CODA, but they are not free and not even so good as Solaris CacheFS. Would you please help me with this question or at least tell me where are the answers? Thank you very much. //leoh main(){int j=1234;char t[]=":@abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz.\n" ,*i = "iqgbgxmlvivuc\n:wwnfwsdoi"; char *strchr(char *,int); while(*i){j+=strchr(t,*i++)-t;j%=sizeof t-1;putchar(t[j]);}} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/