Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751696AbdFILgL (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:36:11 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:36425 "EHLO mail-qt0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751571AbdFILgJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:36:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <03f87297-a986-ac9d-b20b-0f75abcc12f7@ti.com> References: <1496918103-14948-1-git-send-email-raviteja.garimella@broadcom.com> <2f492d5a-9016-f965-8dc2-f669d785ba4d@ti.com> <03f87297-a986-ac9d-b20b-0f75abcc12f7@ti.com> From: Raviteja Garimella Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:06:08 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] Support for USB DRD PHY driver for NS2 To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Jon Mason , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, BCM Kernel Feedback , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1261 Lines: 44 Hi, On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > > On Friday 09 June 2017 04:23 PM, Raviteja Garimella wrote: >> Hi Kishon, >> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Friday 09 June 2017 02:30 PM, Raviteja Garimella wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday 08 June 2017 04:05 PM, Raviteja Garimella wrote: >>>>>> Changes in v8: >>>>>> ============= >>>>>> -Renamed phy shutdown routine >>>>>> -Used devm_request_irq in stead of threaded irq >>>>> >>>>> That's not what I intended. Continue to use threaded irq but remove delayed work. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes I get that. We see intermittent connection issues without delayed >>>> work. Debounce delay matters there. >>> >>> All right! >>> >>> I'm unable to apply the series. Please rebase to linux-phy next (directory >>> structure has changed) >>> >> >> Ok. They got applied to linux-phy next for me without issues. >> I will resend the patchset anyways after rebasing to linux-phy next. > > the patch you sent is not rebased to the latest linux-phy next. > Sorry.. That's correct, I am sending v9. Thanks. > -Kishon