Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262123AbTFIVc6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 17:32:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262148AbTFIVcI (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 17:32:08 -0400 Received: from pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com ([12.47.58.20]:8644 "EHLO pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262123AbTFIVaq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2003 17:30:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 14:40:35 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Diego Calleja =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Garc=EDa?= Cc: solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.70-mm6 Message-Id: <20030609144035.347c2987.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030609232001.3980cb7a.diegocg@teleline.es> References: <20030607151440.6982d8c6.akpm@digeo.com> <20030609232001.3980cb7a.diegocg@teleline.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0pre1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jun 2003 21:44:25.0617 (UTC) FILETIME=[4BCAE810:01C32ED0] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1339 Lines: 31 Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 19:45:58 +0200 (CEST) > Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > > > The interactivity seems to have dropped. Again, with common desktop > > applications: xmms playing with ALSA, when choosing navigating through > > evolution options or browsing with opera, music skipps. > > X is running with nice -10, but with mm5 it ran smoothly. > > Under "heavy" disk usage (when sylpheed finish merging the lkml > messages in the 92M lkml mail folder) X pointer stops moving > (say, 1/8 or 1/6 seconds, very noticeable, pointer stops, windows stop > redrawing, etc). I've noticed similar. Just a new vague jerkiness. > System is a dual p3 800; fs is ext3. This odd behaviour > seems to happen since the 2.5.69-mm9 ext3 locking changes. > (well i started testing 2.5.70-mm3 because i'm timid, > but never happened before in mm or mainline) Might be. There were some CPU scheduler changes a week before 2.5.69-mm9. If it's in ext3 then profiling will probably shake it out. I haven't done a lot of profiling yet. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/