Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751979AbdFLHsD (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 03:48:03 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:8260 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751925AbdFLHsB (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 03:48:01 -0400 From: "liwei (CM)" To: Heiner Kallweit CC: "guodong.xu@linaro.org" , "ulf.hansson@linaro.org" , "adrian.hunter@intel.com" , "jh80.chung@samsung.com" , "shawn.lin@rock-chips.com" , "wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kongfei Subject: =?utf-8?B?562U5aSNOiBbUEFUQ0hdIG1tYzpkd19tbWMtazM6IGFkZCBzZCBzdXBwb3J0?= =?utf-8?Q?_for_hi3660?= Thread-Topic: [PATCH] mmc:dw_mmc-k3: add sd support for hi3660 Thread-Index: AQHSzo639jjLvz9Cc0aRwjeW71LliqIg8MtQ Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:44:13 +0000 Message-ID: <1699CE87DE933F49876AD744B5DC140F9F6F2B@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com> References: <20170516122636.58787-1-liwei213@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.189.155.72] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.593E4659.009B,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=169.254.4.16, so=2014-11-16 11:51:01, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 1705faee91a7b2c68c0fb00cffffc5ba Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id v5C7mHMZ016681 Content-Length: 11724 Lines: 408 Hi, Heiner Sorry late for reply you, thank you very much for your advice. My changes are as follows and I will send the PATCH-V3 later. -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Heiner Kallweit [mailto:hkallweit1@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2017年5月17日 5:52 收件人: liwei (CM); ulf.hansson@linaro.org; adrian.hunter@intel.com; jh80.chung@samsung.com; shawn.lin@rock-chips.com; wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 抄送: guodong.xu@linaro.org 主题: Re: [PATCH] mmc:dw_mmc-k3: add sd support for hi3660 Am 16.05.2017 um 14:26 schrieb liwei: > Add sd card support for hi3660 soc > > Signed-off-by: Li Wei > Signed-off-by: Chen Jun > --- > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c | 311 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 311 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c > b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c index e38fb0020bb1..59d6e0870fb1 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > * (at your option) any later version. > */ > > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -28,7 +29,44 @@ > #define AO_SCTRL_SEL18 BIT(10) > #define AO_SCTRL_CTRL3 0x40C > > +#define DWMMC_SD_ID 1 > +#define DWMMC_SDIO_ID 2 > + > +#define SOC_SCTRL_SCPERCTRL5 (0x314) > +#define SDCARD_IO_SEL18 BIT(2) > + > +#define GENCLK_DIV (7) > + > +#define GPIO_CLK_ENABLE BIT(16) > +#define GPIO_CLK_DIV(x) (((x) & 0xf) << 8) > +#define GPIO_USE_SAMPLE_DLY(x) (((x) & 0x1) << 13) > +#define UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_PHASE(x) (((x) & 0x1f) << 16) > +#define UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_DLY(x) (((x) & 0x1f) << 26) > +#define UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_DRVPHASE(x) (((x) & 0x1f) << 21) Using the GENMASK and FIELD_PREP macros may be a good alternative here, e.g.: #define GPIO_CLK_DIV_MASK GENMASK(11, 8) Then in the code use FIELD_PREP(GPIO_CLK_DIV_MASK, x) And the bit field definitions should follow the register defines, e.g.: #define REG_1 0x00 #define REG_1_FIELD_1 GENMASK(a, b) #define REG_1_FIELD_2 GENMASK(c, d) This makes it easier for people checking the code against the chip spec. 【liwei】I'll fix this issue and update the patch; > +#define SDMMC_UHS_REG_EXT_VALUE(x, y, z) (UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_PHASE(x) |\ > + UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_DLY(y) |\ > + UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_DRVPHASE(z)) #define SDMMC_GPIO_VALUE(x, y) > +(GPIO_CLK_DIV(x) | GPIO_USE_SAMPLE_DLY(y)) Both macros are used only once. So are they actually needed? 【liwei】Yes, they are not needed, I'll update the patch; > + > +#define SDMMC_UHS_REG_EXT 0x108 > +#define SDMMC_ENABLE_SHIFT 0x110 > + > +#define TIMING_MODE 3 > +#define TIMING_CFG_NUM 10 > + > +#define PULL_DOWN BIT(1) > +#define PULL_UP BIT(0) > + > +#define NUM_PHASES (40) > + > +#define ENABLE_SHIFT_MIN_SMPL (4) > +#define ENABLE_SHIFT_MAX_SMPL (12) > +#define USE_DLY_MIN_SMPL (11) > +#define USE_DLY_MAX_SMPL (14) > + > struct k3_priv { > + u8 ctrl_id; > + u32 cur_speed; > struct regmap *reg; > }; > > @@ -38,6 +76,41 @@ static unsigned long dw_mci_hi6220_caps[] = { > 0 > }; > > +struct hs_timing { > + int drv_phase; > + int sam_dly; > + int sam_phase_max; > + int sam_phase_min; > +}; > + > +struct hs_timing hs_timing_cfg[TIMING_MODE][TIMING_CFG_NUM] = { > + { /* reserved */ }, > + { /* SD */ > + {7, 0, 15, 15,}, /* 0: LEGACY 400k */ > + {6, 0, 4, 4,}, /* 1: MMC_HS */ > + {6, 0, 3, 3,}, /* 2: SD_HS */ > + {6, 0, 15, 15,}, /* 3: SDR12 */ > + {6, 0, 2, 2,}, /* 4: SDR25 */ > + {4, 0, 11, 0,}, /* 5: SDR50 */ > + {6, 4, 15, 0,}, /* 6: SDR104 */ > + {0}, /* 7: DDR50 */ > + {0}, /* 8: DDR52 */ > + {0}, /* 9: HS200 */ > + }, > + { /* SDIO */ > + {7, 0, 15, 15,}, /* 0: LEGACY 400k */ > + {0}, /* 1: MMC_HS */ > + {6, 0, 15, 15,}, /* 2: SD_HS */ > + {6, 0, 15, 15,}, /* 3: SDR12 */ > + {6, 0, 0, 0,}, /* 4: SDR25 */ > + {4, 0, 12, 0,}, /* 5: SDR50 */ > + {5, 4, 15, 0,}, /* 6: SDR104 */ > + {0}, /* 7: DDR50 */ > + {0}, /* 8: DDR52 */ > + {0}, /* 9: HS200 */ > + } > +}; > + > static void dw_mci_k3_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios > *ios) { > int ret; > @@ -66,6 +139,10 @@ static int dw_mci_hi6220_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host) > if (IS_ERR(priv->reg)) > priv->reg = NULL; > > + priv->ctrl_id = of_alias_get_id(host->dev->of_node, "mshc"); > + if (priv->ctrl_id < 0) > + priv->ctrl_id = 0; > + > host->priv = priv; > return 0; > } > @@ -144,7 +221,236 @@ static const struct dw_mci_drv_data hi6220_data = { > .execute_tuning = dw_mci_hi6220_execute_tuning, > }; > > +static void dw_mci_hs_set_timing(struct dw_mci *host, int timing, int > +sam_phase) { > + int drv_phase; > + int sam_dly; > + int ctrl_id; > + int use_sam_dly = 0; > + int enable_shift = 0; > + int reg_value; > + struct k3_priv *priv; > + > + priv = host->priv; > + ctrl_id = priv->ctrl_id; > + > + drv_phase = hs_timing_cfg[ctrl_id][timing].drv_phase; > + sam_dly = hs_timing_cfg[ctrl_id][timing].sam_dly; > + if (sam_phase == -1) > + sam_phase = (hs_timing_cfg[ctrl_id][timing].sam_phase_max + > + hs_timing_cfg[ctrl_id][timing].sam_phase_min) / 2; > + > + if (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50 || > + timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104) { > + if (sam_phase >= ENABLE_SHIFT_MIN_SMPL && > + sam_phase <= ENABLE_SHIFT_MAX_SMPL) > + enable_shift = 1; > + } > + if (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104) { > + if (sam_phase >= USE_DLY_MIN_SMPL && > + sam_phase <= USE_DLY_MAX_SMPL) > + use_sam_dly = 1; > + } > + > + mci_writel(host, GPIO, 0x0); > + udelay(5); > + > + reg_value = SDMMC_UHS_REG_EXT_VALUE(sam_phase, sam_dly, drv_phase); > + mci_writel(host, UHS_REG_EXT, reg_value); > + > + mci_writel(host, ENABLE_SHIFT, enable_shift); > + > + reg_value = SDMMC_GPIO_VALUE(GENCLK_DIV, use_sam_dly); > + mci_writel(host, GPIO, (unsigned int)reg_value | GPIO_CLK_ENABLE); > + > + /* We should delay 1ms wait for timing setting finished. */ > + mdelay(1); See Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt, better use usleep_range here. 【liwei】You are right, I'll update the patch; > +} > + > +int dw_mci_hi3660_init(struct dw_mci *host) { > + /* set threshold to 512 bytes */ > + mci_writel(host, CDTHRCTL, 0x02000001); > + > + dw_mci_hs_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_LEGACY, -1); > + host->bus_hz /= (GENCLK_DIV + 1); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int dw_mci_set_sel18(struct dw_mci *host, bool set) { > + int ret; > + unsigned int val; > + struct k3_priv *priv; > + > + priv = host->priv; > + > + val = set ? SDCARD_IO_SEL18 : 0; > + ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->reg, SOC_SCTRL_SCPERCTRL5, > + SDCARD_IO_SEL18, val); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(host->dev, "sel18 %u error\n", val); > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +void dw_mci_hi3660_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios) > +{ > + int ret; > + unsigned long wanted; > + unsigned long actual; > + struct k3_priv *priv = host->priv; > + > + if (!ios->clock || ios->clock == priv->cur_speed) > + return; > + > + wanted = ios->clock * (GENCLK_DIV + 1); > + ret = clk_set_rate(host->ciu_clk, wanted); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(host->dev, "failed to set rate %luHz\n", wanted); > + return; > + } > + actual = clk_get_rate(host->ciu_clk); > + > + dw_mci_hs_set_timing(host, ios->timing, -1); > + host->bus_hz = actual / (GENCLK_DIV + 1); > + host->current_speed = 0; > + priv->cur_speed = host->bus_hz; > +} > + > +static int dw_mci_get_best_clksmpl(unsigned int sample_flag) { > + int i; > + int interval; > + unsigned int v; > + unsigned int len; > + unsigned int range_start = 0; > + unsigned int range_length = 0; > + unsigned int middle_range = 0; > + > + if (!sample_flag) > + return -EIO; > + > + if (~sample_flag == 0) > + return 0; > + > + i = ffs(sample_flag) - 1; > + > + while (i < 32) { > + v = ror32(sample_flag, i); > + len = ffs(~v) - 1; IMO it would be worth adding a comment explaining this magic. 【liwei】This magic number is not easy to understand，so I'll add a commit in the new patch. > + > + if (len > range_length) { > + range_length = len; > + range_start = i; > + } > + > + interval = ffs(v >> len) - 1; > + if (interval < 0) > + break; > + > + i += len + interval; > + } > + > + middle_range = range_start + range_length / 2; > + if (middle_range >= 32) > + middle_range %= 32; > + > + return middle_range; > +} > + > +static int dw_mci_hi3660_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 > +opcode) { > + int i = 0; > + struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; > + struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc; > + int sam_phase = 0; > + u32 tuning_sample_flag = 0; > + int best_clksmpl = 0; > + > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PHASES; ++i, ++sam_phase) { > + sam_phase %= 32; > + > + mci_writel(host, TMOUT, ~0); > + dw_mci_hs_set_timing(host, mmc->ios.timing, sam_phase); > + > + if (!mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, NULL)) > + tuning_sample_flag |= (1 << sam_phase); > + else > + tuning_sample_flag &= ~(1 << sam_phase); > + } > + > + best_clksmpl = dw_mci_get_best_clksmpl(tuning_sample_flag); > + if (best_clksmpl < 0) { > + dev_err(host->dev, "All phases bad!\n"); > + return -EIO; > + } > + > + dw_mci_hs_set_timing(host, mmc->ios.timing, best_clksmpl); > + > + dev_info(host->dev, "tuning ok best_clksmpl %u tuning_sample_flag %x\n", > + best_clksmpl, tuning_sample_flag); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int dw_mci_hi3660_switch_voltage(struct mmc_host *mmc, > + struct mmc_ios *ios) > +{ > + int ret; > + int min_uv = 0; > + int max_uv = 0; > + struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc); > + struct k3_priv *priv; > + struct dw_mci *host; > + > + host = slot->host; > + priv = host->priv; > + > + if (!priv || !priv->reg) > + return 0; > + > + if (priv->ctrl_id == DWMMC_SDIO_ID) > + return 0; > + > + if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330) { > + ret = dw_mci_set_sel18(host, 0); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + min_uv = 2950000; > + max_uv = 2950000; > + } else if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180) { > + ret = dw_mci_set_sel18(host, 1); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + min_uv = 1800000; > + max_uv = 1800000; > + } > + > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mmc->supply.vqmmc)) > + return 0; > + > + ret = regulator_set_voltage(mmc->supply.vqmmc, min_uv, max_uv); > + if (ret) { > + dev_dbg(host->dev, "Regulator set error %d: %d - %d\n", > + ret, min_uv, max_uv); > + return ret; > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct dw_mci_drv_data hi3660_data = { > + .init = dw_mci_hi3660_init, > + .set_ios = dw_mci_hi3660_set_ios, > + .parse_dt = dw_mci_hi6220_parse_dt, > + .execute_tuning = dw_mci_hi3660_execute_tuning, > + .switch_voltage = dw_mci_hi3660_switch_voltage, }; > + > static const struct of_device_id dw_mci_k3_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "hisilicon,hi3660-dw-mshc", .data = &hi3660_data, }, > { .compatible = "hisilicon,hi4511-dw-mshc", .data = &k3_drv_data, }, > { .compatible = "hisilicon,hi6220-dw-mshc", .data = &hi6220_data, }, > {}, > @@ -155,6 +461,11 @@ static int dw_mci_k3_probe(struct platform_device > *pdev) { > const struct dw_mci_drv_data *drv_data; > const struct of_device_id *match; > + struct reset_control *rst; > + > + rst = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > + if (!IS_ERR(rst)) > + reset_control_reset(rst); > > match = of_match_node(dw_mci_k3_match, pdev->dev.of_node); > drv_data = match->data; > Small disclaimer: The remarks are based on my experience when submitting patches. The actual maintainers opinion might differ.