Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752642AbdFLL2u (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:28:50 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f194.google.com ([74.125.82.194]:34952 "EHLO mail-ot0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751969AbdFLL2t (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:28:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <593e7405.13d31c0a.ae58e.4696@mx.google.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 13:28:48 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: v-0AoEhpOJvCbYLdbh-GQpNwNDY Message-ID: Subject: Re: stable-rc/linux-4.4.y build: 199 builds: 13 failed, 186 passed, 13 errors, 4 warnings (v4.4.71-63-g409ebd600970) To: "kernelci.org bot" Cc: Tom Gall , Sumit Semwal , Amit Pundir , Arnd Bergmann , Anmar Oueja , Alexander Sverdlin , Vinod Koul , Lars-Peter Clausen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, gregkh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1689 Lines: 46 [+cc GregKH] On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:59 PM, kernelci.org bot wrote: >> stable-rc/linux-4.4.y build: 199 builds: 13 failed, 186 passed, 13 errors, 4 warnings (v4.4.71-63-g409ebd600970) >> >> >> arm: gcc version 5.3.1 20160412 (Linaro GCC 5.3-2016.05) >> >> ep93xx_defconfig: 1 error >> >> mips: gcc version 6.3.0 (GCC) >> >> decstation_defconfig: 1 error >> defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y: 1 error >> ip22_defconfig: 1 error >> jazz_defconfig: 1 error >> malta_defconfig: 1 error >> malta_kvm_defconfig: 1 error >> malta_kvm_guest_defconfig: 1 error >> maltaup_xpa_defconfig: 1 error >> nlm_xlp_defconfig: 1 error >> nlm_xlr_defconfig: 1 error >> rm200_defconfig: 1 error >> >> Errors summary: >> >> 12 fs/ufs/balloc.c:501:26: error: implicit declaration of function 'i_blocksize' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > Same as stable-rc/linux-4.9.y, this needs a backport of 93407472a21b ("fs: add > i_blocksize()") > >> 1 drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c:1357:9: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'device_synchronize' > > The error was introudced by the backport of 98f9de366fcc ("dmaengine: ep93xx: > Don't drain the transfers in terminate_all()"), which requires the dmaengine > synchronize callback. > > device_synchronize was introduced by b36f09c3c441 ("dmaengine: Add transfer > termination synchronization support") in linux-4.5. That is not a > bugfix but would > cleanly apply on top of 4.4 and has no dependencies or side-effects. > > We can either revert 98f9de366fcc or backport b36f09c3c441. > > Arnd