Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752063AbdFLM3J (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:29:09 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:32934 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751944AbdFLM3I (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:29:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 13:29:04 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Olav Haugan Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/dma-mapping: Fix null-pointer check Message-ID: <20170612122903.GC24187@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20170610194110.27712-1-ohaugan@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170610194110.27712-1-ohaugan@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1135 Lines: 33 On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:41:10PM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote: > @@ -149,6 +140,11 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, > bool coherent = is_device_dma_coherent(dev); > pgprot_t prot = __get_dma_pgprot(attrs, PAGE_KERNEL, false); > > + if (!dev) { > + WARN_ONCE(1, "Use an actual device structure for DMA allocation\n"); > + return NULL; > + } > + > size = PAGE_ALIGN(size); > > if (!coherent && !gfpflags_allow_blocking(flags)) { > @@ -192,8 +188,13 @@ static void __dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, > void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle, > unsigned long attrs) > { > - void *swiotlb_addr = phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, dma_handle)); > + void *swiotlb_addr; > > + if (!dev) { > + WARN_ONCE(1, "Use an actual device structure for DMA free\n"); > + return; > + } > + swiotlb_addr = phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, dma_handle)); I don't think we need the checks anymore. With commit 1dccb598df54 ("arm64: simplify dma_get_ops") __generic_dma_ops() returns dummy_dma_ops when dev == NULL, so the above __dma_alloc/__dma_free functions would not be called. -- Catalin