Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752163AbdFLMoI (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:44:08 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f193.google.com ([74.125.82.193]:34383 "EHLO mail-ot0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751997AbdFLMoF (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:44:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170612115946.GA17130@kroah.com> References: <593e7405.13d31c0a.ae58e.4696@mx.google.com> <20170612115946.GA17130@kroah.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:44:04 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TbRSwbcvFuTzJVZF3ii0TpJ9r08 Message-ID: Subject: Re: stable-rc/linux-4.4.y build: 199 builds: 13 failed, 186 passed, 13 errors, 4 warnings (v4.4.71-63-g409ebd600970) To: gregkh Cc: "kernelci.org bot" , Tom Gall , Sumit Semwal , Amit Pundir , Arnd Bergmann , Anmar Oueja , Alexander Sverdlin , Vinod Koul , Lars-Peter Clausen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1198 Lines: 25 On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:59 PM, gregkh wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:28:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> 1 drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c:1357:9: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'device_synchronize' >> > >> > The error was introudced by the backport of 98f9de366fcc ("dmaengine: ep93xx: >> > Don't drain the transfers in terminate_all()"), which requires the dmaengine >> > synchronize callback. >> > >> > device_synchronize was introduced by b36f09c3c441 ("dmaengine: Add transfer >> > termination synchronization support") in linux-4.5. That is not a >> > bugfix but would >> > cleanly apply on top of 4.4 and has no dependencies or side-effects. >> > >> > We can either revert 98f9de366fcc or backport b36f09c3c441. > > I'll just go drop 98f9de366fcc as that's best here. I don't think > anyone really cares about this driver in 4.4, and if they do, then they > can speak up :) Sounds fine. ep93xx was once an important platform and the chips are still being sold, but I guess not many users remain. Alexander Sverdlin just stepped up as the platform maintainer, so he can decide whether he wants his fix in linux-4.4.y. Arnd