Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932097AbdFLPhR (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:37:17 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:41726 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754101AbdFLPhN (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:37:13 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Kristina Martsenko , Catalin Marinas Subject: [PATCH 4.9 109/119] arm64: hw_breakpoint: fix watchpoint matching for tagged pointers Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:26:11 +0200 Message-Id: <20170612152604.163523082@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.1 In-Reply-To: <20170612152556.601664278@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20170612152556.601664278@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2894 Lines: 75 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Kristina Martsenko commit 7dcd9dd8cebe9fa626af7e2358d03a37041a70fb upstream. This backport has a small difference from the upstream commit: - The address tag is removed in watchpoint_handler() instead of get_distance_from_watchpoint(), because 4.9 does not have commit fdfeff0f9e3d ("arm64: hw_breakpoint: Handle inexact watchpoint addresses"). Original patch description: When we take a watchpoint exception, the address that triggered the watchpoint is found in FAR_EL1. We compare it to the address of each configured watchpoint to see which one was hit. The configured watchpoint addresses are untagged, while the address in FAR_EL1 will have an address tag if the data access was done using a tagged address. The tag needs to be removed to compare the address to the watchpoints. Currently we don't remove it, and as a result can report the wrong watchpoint as being hit (specifically, always either the highest TTBR0 watchpoint or lowest TTBR1 watchpoint). This patch removes the tag. Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0") Acked-by: Mark Rutland Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 6 +++--- arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -105,9 +105,9 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t f }) /* - * When dealing with data aborts or instruction traps we may end up with - * a tagged userland pointer. Clear the tag to get a sane pointer to pass - * on to access_ok(), for instance. + * When dealing with data aborts, watchpoints, or instruction traps we may end + * up with a tagged userland pointer. Clear the tag to get a sane pointer to + * pass on to access_ok(), for instance. */ #define untagged_addr(addr) sign_extend64(addr, 55) --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include /* Breakpoint currently in use for each BRP. */ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_event *, bp_on_reg[ARM_MAX_BRP]); @@ -696,7 +697,7 @@ static int watchpoint_handler(unsigned l /* Check if the watchpoint value matches. */ val = read_wb_reg(AARCH64_DBG_REG_WVR, i); - if (val != (addr & ~alignment_mask)) + if (val != (untagged_addr(addr) & ~alignment_mask)) goto unlock; /* Possible match, check the byte address select to confirm. */